Challenge #6

Hit Identification
Method type (check all that applies)
Deep learning
High-throughput docking
Machine learning
Hybrid of the above
Active Learning, Pharmacophore, and Machine learning
Description of your approach (min 200 and max 800 words)

The design of molecules targeting the histone binding groove of the SETDB1 triple Tudor domain (TTD) presents a unique opportunity to discover novel therapeutics. We propose two complementary strategies: active learning and pharmacophore modeling, to identify and optimize potential inhibitors for SETDB1 TTD. 

In the first strategy, we employ an active learning approach utilizing MOLPAL, an open-source package, on the PDB structure 7CJT, which is complexed with a top active compound exhibiting a dissociation constant (kD) of 100 nM. We will screen the Enamine Real subset library, consisting of 48 million compounds, and select the top 15,000 compounds based on their predicted scores for further docking studies using smina. Subsequent analysis will involve pose validation, interaction assessment, and filtering based on solubility and other physicochemical properties. From this pool, we aim to procure and test 70 compounds.

The second strategy involves generating multiple interaction-based pharmacophore models for all subcavities of the SETDB1 TTD using Pharmit, an open-source pharmacophore modeling and screening platform. These models will facilitate virtual screening against the Enamine Real library. We will select the top 2,000 molecules from each pharmacophore screening based on RMSD and predicted docking scores obtained from Pharmit's minimization function. The resulting hit list will undergo docking against the respective subpockets using smina, followed by pose review, interaction analysis, and solubility and property filtering. From this approach, we plan to procure and test 30 compounds.

By integrating these diverse strategies, focusing on both the top active compound and the least active compounds binding to different subpockets, we aim to identify better binders with a ratio of 70:30 (active learning to pharmacophore). This dual approach is expected to enhance our ability to discover potent inhibitors for the SETDB1 TTD.

What makes your approach stand out from the community? (<100 words)

By integrating these diverse strategies, focusing on both the top active compound and the least active compounds binding to different subpockets, we aim to identify better binders with a ratio of 70:30 (active learning to pharmacophore). This dual approach, combining cutting-edge computational techniques and extensive screening libraries, stands out in the community by maximizing the chemical space explored and increasing the likelihood of discovering potent inhibitors for the SETDB1 TTD.

 

 

 

 

Method Name
Active learning, and pharmacophore driven molecular design
Free software packages used

1. Molpal: Graff DE, Shakhnovich EI, Coley CW. Accelerating high-throughput virtual screening through molecular pool-based active learning. Chem Sci. 2021 Apr 29;12(22):7866-7881. doi: 10.1039/d0sc06805e. PMID: 34168840; PMCID: PMC8188596. https://github.com/coleygroup/molpal/tree/main

2. Pharmit: Sunseri J, Koes DR. Pharmit: interactive exploration of chemical space. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016 Jul 8;44(W1):W442-8. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw287. Epub 2016 Apr 19. PMID: 27095195; PMCID: PMC4987880. https://github.com/dkoes/pharmit

3. SMINA/AUTODOCK: Koes DR, Baumgartner MP, Camacho CJ. Lessons learned in empirical scoring with smina from the CSAR 2011 benchmarking exercise. J Chem Inf Model. 2013 Aug 26;53(8):1893-904. doi: 10.1021/ci300604z. Epub 2013 Feb 12. PMID: 23379370; PMCID: PMC3726561. https://sourceforge.net/projects/smina/

Relevant publications of previous uses by your group of this software/method

We dont have relevant publications on active learning (MOLPAL) and we applied AL for multiple projects with 80% success rate and manuscript in writing.

Here is few sucess stories on pharmacophore modelling, and virtual screening:

1. Berishvili VP, Kuimov AN, Voronkov AE, Radchenko EV, Kumar P, Choonara YE, Pillay V, Kamal A, Palyulin VA. Discovery of Novel Tankyrase Inhibitors through Molecular Docking-Based Virtual Screening and Molecular Dynamics Simulation Studies. Molecules. 2020 Jul 11;25(14):3171. doi: 10.3390/molecules25143171. PMID: 32664504; PMCID: PMC7397142.

2. Raghu R, Devaraji V, Leena K, Riyaz SD, Rani PB, Kumar BS, Naik PK, Dubey PK, Velmurugan D, Vijayalakshmi M. Virtual screening and discovery of novel aurora kinase inhibitors. Curr Top Med Chem. 2014;14(17):2006-19. doi: 10.2174/1568026614666140929151140. PMID: 25262798.

3. Korrapati SB, Yedla P, Pillai GG, Mohammad F, Ch VRR, Bhamidipati P, Amanchy R, Syed R, Kamal A. In-silico driven design and development of spirobenzimidazo-quinazolines as potential DNA gyrase inhibitors. Biomed Pharmacother. 2021 Feb;134:111132. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2020.111132. Epub 2020 Dec 24. PMID: 33360050.

4. Kumar AV, Mohan K, Riyaz S. Structure guided inhibitor designing of CDK2 and discovery of potential leads against cancer. J Mol Model. 2013 Sep;19(9):3581-9. doi: 10.1007/s00894-013-1887-8. Epub 2013 Jun 1. PMID: 23728955.